Gmail: Messages per day Defined

Submitted by stephen black on Wed, 2006-03-29 22:42. :: Internet Marketing

Recently I tried to send out an announcement to many of my friends and acquaintances, regarding a movie I am in, as well as some news on gaming classes for children.(See attached)

In doing this I set off Google's spam detector. After a flurry of emails to Google, I did receive a response:

-the limit of emails is 500 per day

-your account will also be frozen if you are sending out a large number of gmails which turn out to be undeliverable.

After an unspecified period, your account will return to normal.

I could not find this information out before the fact.If it happens, there is no pop up warning: you just lose the ability to send.

 

stephen black's blog | PDF | delicious | digg | reddit | technorati | 603 reads
sjc1204
Bcc
Submitted by sjc1204 on Thu, 2006-03-30 06:39.

Why is everyone so clueless about how to use Bcc? It's so annoying to receive a mass mailing with all receipients names and addresses in the main To: field.

login or register to post comments
Darhazer
Read the manual
Submitted by Darhazer on Thu, 2006-03-30 03:03.

Sending a message to more than 500 recipients. You can send a single
message to a maximum of 500 recipients. Their email addresses can be
distributed among the 'To:,' 'Cc:,' and 'Bcc:' fields.

https://mail.google.com/support/bin/answer.py?answer=22839&topic=1526

login or register to post comments
TheRevelator
Thanks for the Heads-up Mr. Black
Submitted by TheRevelator on Thu, 2006-03-30 00:03.

I stay away from all of what is Google's ever-increasing realm excepting the search engine; I have even disabled my publishing id here and elsewhere...I will continue to wish any and all the hoped for coinage from Google's dep pockets but I trust few and thay are far between. Great advice from a wise one again, thanks again for the heads-up.

TR/cw

login or register to post comments
Bjorn Tipling
You're being ridiculous
Submitted by Bjorn Tipling on Thu, 2006-03-30 02:47.

Over dramatic reaction to a completely minor thing. You're just all up in arms because some one said 'Google' and that invoked in you some type of misplaced personal frustration about individual powerlessness or some other pseudo-pop-psychological syndrome. In any case, the article was about what Google was doing to fight spam! From whatever perspective I look at it, you turn out to be completely wrong.

login or register to post comments